ON LIVING IN INTERESTING TIMES
November 27, 2022 Leave a comment
ON LIVING IN INTERESTING TIMES.
When Queen Elizabeth II died, I was surprised how sad I felt, for I have never been a royalist. I can remember the queen’s coronation – I had been around 3 – and I had rather a sceptical attitude even then for I remember thinking, why all this fuss, and wondering why I had been given a mug – what did that have to do with the queen being crowned? But the Queen’s lifelong dedication to what she perceived as her duty must be admired, and her high standards of behaviour were an example to us all. Apart from being an actual Queen she carried the archetype extremely well, which few women can do.
I am by no means confident that the same level of praise can be applied to the newly appointed king. It is a British tradition that one does not criticise the throne’s incumbent and I will observe this rule. I do rather object to a head of state being appointed with no assent from The People. I concede he has done nothing to offend us yet, but the day is young.
I notice Camilla is always referred to as the queen-consort, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, and Queen Mary were also queens consort but it was not felt necessary to define their status so precisely and these ladies were simply known as ‘the queen’.
We are surrounded by women in prominent political positions, nót necessarily to the benefit of female reputation for high office. Líz Truss I have written about already as ‘a joke’ and I stand by my view. I have always given incoming Prime Ministers the benefit of the doubt and credited them with having thought deeply about the problems faced by the country during their time in office, and having workable ideas which might fix them. The desert that was Miss Truss’s inner landscape – empty with just sand blowing in the wind was alarming to view, and I did not feel sorry about her departure.
Another lady in a prominent position is Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister for Scotland who has just asked our Supreme Court whether, England having refused her request for a lawful referendum, she can go ahead and carryout the vote on her own authority. It cannot come as much of a surprise to you all, that the ruling came back, No, she couldn’t. I would not put it past Nicola for her to have raised the matter at this time, hoping for a NO reply, because nothing is more likely to draw people to the cause, than for the English to have the impertinence to deny them the opportunity. Who do the English think they are? The dominant nation, is the answer, the country within the union that can outvote everyone else, and therefore can do whatever it likes.
We come back to my proposal that we opt for a federation, with the north of England a separate region from the South (or however you decide to divide it); the house of government for the federation somewhere in the middle of the country, the Palace of Westminster left to London as its seat of government, and certain matters (defence, foreign affairs, finance) left for the federal government; with a head of state (which could be the crown if a majority voted for that).
The Prime Minister ought to have replied, with a smile, that she could hold a referendum (at Scotland’s expense) whenever she liked. He had confidence in the prudence and sense of the Scottish people that they would see that the advantage lay in an alliance with England. He hoped they chose to remain inside the union. He valued the enormous contribution they had made to the prosperity and culture of the United Kingdom but whatever the outcome he would hope to remain a friend and supporter of Scotland. If the English could have this generosity of spirit, Nicola would have no case to present to the people of Scotland.
The Chinese had a saying, May you live in uninteresting times (which were deemed to be uneventful and therefore safer and more prosperous.) My friends, I put it to you. We live in interesting times.